{"id":14765,"date":"2026-01-28T21:50:34","date_gmt":"2026-01-28T13:50:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765"},"modified":"2026-01-28T21:50:40","modified_gmt":"2026-01-28T13:50:40","slug":"defense-industry-flummoxed-by-trumps-executive-order-on-profits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765","title":{"rendered":"Defense industry flummoxed by Trump\u2019s executive order on profits\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Defense contractors are perplexed by President Trump administration\u2019s executive order outlining vague new rules for its weapons suppliers, unsure how to proceed and raising questions about its legality.President Trump administration\u2019s executive order outlining vague new rules for its weapons suppliers, unsure how to proceed and raising questions about its legality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The executive order \u2014 echoing recent speeches delivered by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent \u2014 Pete Hegseth and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent \u2014 rebukes defense firms for stock buybacks, paying dividends to investors and high compensation for CEOs, rather than using profits to invest in plant capacity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But while defense experts and company executives agree more could be done to bolster the defense supply chain, they argue the executive order is legally questionable and lacking a clear roadmap on the path forward to do so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIf you\u2019re trying to encourage more companies to get involved and be suppliers to the DOD, this is not the best way to do that,\u201d one defense industry lobbyist told The Hill, referring to the Department of Defense. \u201cCompanies may not want to do business with DOD if they are subject to this. Plus, obviously it\u2019s not legally enforceable to stop dividends and cap pay, so how do you enforce that?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump in early January signed an executive order aimed at addressing cost overruns and delayed timelines in delivering weapons. He followed up with a lengthy Trump Social post that loudly declared \u201cMILITARY EQUIPMENT IS NOT BEING MADE FAST ENOUGH!\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cDefense Contractors are currently issuing massive Dividends to their Shareholders and massive Stock Buybacks, at the expense and detriment of investing in Plants and Equipment,\u201d the president wrote. \u201cThis situation will no longer be allowed or tolerated!\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He also claimed that defense executives must build new and modern production plants and, until they do so, should not be allowed to make more than $5 million dollars annually.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bessent on Tuesday defended Trump\u2019s move, accusing U.S. defense companies of falling short of their patriotic duty by not delivering weapons on time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThese defense contractors have let down the American people,\u201d Bessent said at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, saying they were \u201cfive, six, seven years behind on fulfillment of their contracts.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSo I do not think it is unreasonable to tell them that until further notice, you need to build more factories and buy back less stock,\u201d said Bessent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He also backed Trump\u2019s proposal that no defense firm CEO should earn more than $5 million until they up their company\u2019s production speed and maintenance, claiming that executives \u201care making $30 [million], $50 million a year for failing the American people.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those figures are far above the more than $18 million the CEOs of the top five defense contractors \u2014 Lockheed Martin, RTX (formerly Raytheon), Boeing, Northrop Grumman and General Dynamics \u2014 earned in 2024, according to company filings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Northrop Grumman did not respond to a request for comment from The Hill while RTX, Boeing and General Dynamics declined to comment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A Lockheed Martin spokesperson only told The Hill that the company shares Trump\u2019s and the Pentagon\u2019s \u201cfocus on speed, accountability, and results, and will continue to invest and innovate at scale to ensure our warfighters maintain a decisive advantage and are never sent into a fair fight.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Speaking at a Lockheed Martin facility in Texas last week, Hegseth declared that the defense industry is \u201cnot just about Wall Street and dividends and stock buybacks.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt\u2019s about the Warriors and what we can deliver as fast as possible to them\u2026,\u201d Hegseth said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cPresident Trump\u2019s deadly serious about this. He feels the urgency of the moment, and so do I.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But the administration has not said how it would compel firms to carry out Trump\u2019s demands. The Pentagon and White House did not respond to requests for comment from The Hill on how long the order is expected to be in effect and who it applies to, among other questions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Pentagon declined to answer the same questions, only offering a statement that claimed the executive order would \u201censure efficiency and accountability.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAfter numerous years of failing to meet contractual obligations, under President Trump\u2019s order, defense contractors will no longer be allowed to leave our warfighters behind while giving themselves massive payouts from stock buybacks,\u201d chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in the statement.Sean Parnell said in the statement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis will give the Department of War the ability to meet national security objectives and ensure efficiency and accountability. Our obligation is to our warfighters; not Wall Street.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bessent on Tuesday touched briefly on the timeline of the order, saying, \u201cwe can talk about removing those restrictions\u201d once companies get to a normalized level of backlog, around two years or three years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI just don\u2019t think people know how to navigate this just yet,\u201d the lobbyist said. \u201cI think that there\u2019s some legitimacy to the argument that the companies are focused primarily on rewarding shareholders than anything else \u2014 these companies are more concerned about what weapon systems they make the most profit off of versus what the systems are that the government needs the investment into.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They added: \u201cIt\u2019s a good way to start a conversation, but it\u2019s unclear how to handle that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump in his second term has sought to implement a sweeping overhaul to how the Pentagon buys weapons, a restructuring aimed at having the U.S. military more quickly acquire new armaments and technology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The reforms are meant to target what the administration sees as an unacceptably slow procurement process, with officials blaming bureaucracy, misaligned incentives and lack of competition that has knee-capped the military\u2019s ability to get new technology into the hands of warfighters quickly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cOne thing\u2019s clear, he\u2019s sick of big prime contractors, they\u2019re over budget and over schedule. He\u2019s clearly sending a message,\u201d said Jeff Green, a Washington-based lobbyist with J.A. Green & Co.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAnybody that\u2019s surprised by this isn\u2019t paying attention and doesn\u2019t understand how the president uses leverage,\u201d Green added. \u201cI\u2019m just amused at the number of people in town that are throwing up their hands saying, \u2018I can\u2019t believe it.\u2019 I\u2019m like, \u2018where you been last year?\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The idea for acquisition reform has received little pushback in Congress, which has long decried cost overruns and delays of such high-profile weapons as the F-35 fighter jet and the Boeing-made KC-46 tanker. But Congressional appropriators this week warned that speed \u201cmust be factored alongside cost, performance, lethality and scalability.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Pentagon has long been criticized for inflexible internal workings, unpredictable buying patterns and multi-year contracts with one company that can destroy competition. Lawmakers want to see the Defense Department address these issues before providing more budget flexibility (Trump is pushing to increase the Pentagon budget by some 50 percent).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the industry side, contractors complain about the Pentagon not consistently buying a certain weapon or piece of equipment year-over-year, which forces companies to slow their supply chains or shutter them altogether, making it difficult and costly to quickly start back up.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cRapid delivery of ineffective weapon systems at exorbitant cost will not serve the warfighter well,\u201d the appropriators wrote in the House\u2019s final 2026 minibus funding package, released early Tuesday. Defense spending in the bill is set at more than $839 billion, about $8.4 billion more than the White House\u2019s fiscal 2026 request.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Appropriators also said they were concerned that recent reductions to the acquisition workforce due to DOGE\u2019s massive federal layoffs \u2014 \u201cthe effects of which have yet to be realized\u201d \u2014 will negatively affect the Pentagon\u2019s ability to achieve any speed and agility sought by reforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One company Trump singled out is RTX, calling it \u201cthe least responsive\u201d and threatening to cut the firm\u2019s government contracts if it didn\u2019t spend more on plants and equipment. The contractor is the maker of Tomahawk cruise missiles, used in recent strikes in Nigeria and in Yemen against Houthi targets last year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Tomahawks take years to produce, with the company only churning out 50 or 60 annually, far below the hundreds the administration used last year alone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cEither Raytheon steps up \u2026 or they will no longer be doing business with\u201d the government, Trump said in a separate Truth Social post.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

RTX did not respond to a request for comment from The Hill on the attacks from the president.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump has also complained about the two new Boeing-built Air Force Ones ordered in his first term that have faced serious delays and likely will be completed just as Trump is about to end his second term or right thereafter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The two planes currently used as Air Force One have been in the air for nearly four decades. Their age was on display Tuesday when a minor electrical issue aboard one aircraft led the crew to turn it around 30 minutes into Trump\u2019s flight to Davos, Switzerland.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cHe\u2019s being turned around in the middle of the night on Air Force One, because all the power goes out, and he\u2019s like, \u2018Where the hell is my plane? It\u2019s going to be ready when I\u2019m out of here.\u2019 So what do you think he\u2019s going to do?\u201d Green said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some defense firms have argued, however, that they should not be subject to the administration\u2019s demands, including Leonardo DRS. The company insists it has invested its fair share to make sure it is expanding capacity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe\u2019ve invested a lot of money in making sure that our customers are successful, expanding capacity and innovating,\u201d John Baylouny, Leonardo DRS\u2019s newly appointed president and CEO, told National Defense last week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He added that the administration is in the right mindset in urging defense contractors to invest more, but that DRS \u201cis leaning forward\u201d and \u201cshouldn\u2019t be on the naughty list.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Defense contractors are perplexed by President Trump administration\u2019s executive order outlining vague new rules for its weapons suppliers, unsure how to proceed and raising questions about its legality.President Trump administration\u2019s executive order outlining vague new rules for its weapons suppliers, unsure how to proceed and raising questions about its legality. The executive order \u2014 echoing […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":14766,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[1724,61],"class_list":["post-14765","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-international","tag-trump","tag-usa"],"yoast_head":"\nDefense industry flummoxed by Trump\u2019s executive order on profits\u00a0 - LISTEN WORLD<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Defense industry flummoxed by Trump\u2019s executive order on profits\u00a0 - LISTEN WORLD\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Defense contractors are perplexed by President Trump administration\u2019s executive order outlining vague new rules for its weapons suppliers, unsure how to proceed and raising questions about its legality.President Trump administration\u2019s executive order outlining vague new rules for its weapons suppliers, unsure how to proceed and raising questions about its legality. The executive order \u2014 echoing […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LISTEN WORLD\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-28T13:50:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-28T13:50:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/12.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"450\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"277\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Susan\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/\",\"name\":\"LISTEN WORLD\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/12.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/12.png\",\"width\":450,\"height\":277},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765\",\"name\":\"Defense industry flummoxed by Trump\u2019s executive order on profits\u00a0 - LISTEN WORLD\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-01-28T13:50:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-28T13:50:40+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/#\/schema\/person\/498ae6e9ab176e1d69d1e7eca8de7977\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\u9996\u9875\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Defense industry flummoxed by Trump\u2019s executive order on profits\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/#\/schema\/person\/498ae6e9ab176e1d69d1e7eca8de7977\",\"name\":\"Susan\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5b524a019e7b5d16b90d0eee2bd96558a7a5ffc499732f852410f53bc0a7e251?s=96&d=wavatar&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5b524a019e7b5d16b90d0eee2bd96558a7a5ffc499732f852410f53bc0a7e251?s=96&d=wavatar&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Susan\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?author=7\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Defense industry flummoxed by Trump\u2019s executive order on profits\u00a0 - LISTEN WORLD","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Defense industry flummoxed by Trump\u2019s executive order on profits\u00a0 - LISTEN WORLD","og_description":"Defense contractors are perplexed by President Trump administration\u2019s executive order outlining vague new rules for its weapons suppliers, unsure how to proceed and raising questions about its legality.President Trump administration\u2019s executive order outlining vague new rules for its weapons suppliers, unsure how to proceed and raising questions about its legality. The executive order \u2014 echoing […]","og_url":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765","og_site_name":"LISTEN WORLD","article_published_time":"2026-01-28T13:50:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-01-28T13:50:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":450,"height":277,"url":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/12.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Susan","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/#website","url":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/","name":"LISTEN WORLD","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/12.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/12.png","width":450,"height":277},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765#webpage","url":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765","name":"Defense industry flummoxed by Trump\u2019s executive order on profits\u00a0 - LISTEN WORLD","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2026-01-28T13:50:34+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-28T13:50:40+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/#\/schema\/person\/498ae6e9ab176e1d69d1e7eca8de7977"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?p=14765#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\u9996\u9875","item":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Defense industry flummoxed by Trump\u2019s executive order on profits\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/#\/schema\/person\/498ae6e9ab176e1d69d1e7eca8de7977","name":"Susan","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5b524a019e7b5d16b90d0eee2bd96558a7a5ffc499732f852410f53bc0a7e251?s=96&d=wavatar&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5b524a019e7b5d16b90d0eee2bd96558a7a5ffc499732f852410f53bc0a7e251?s=96&d=wavatar&r=g","caption":"Susan"},"url":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/?author=7"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14765","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14765"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14765\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14767,"href":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14765\/revisions\/14767"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/14766"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14765"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14765"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tingchao.xyz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14765"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}